Fact-check the "fact-checkers". You have been lied to about vaccines and masks by the media and government. Check out the "100% censored; 0% debunked" movie series: PLANDEMIC . Masks don't work (like flies through a chain-link fence because virus is in nanometer- size) For REAL news, watch FrankSpeech.com, WorldviewWeekend.com, Americasvoice.com, "ThriveTimeShow" on Rumble.com, or One America News. Don't be a Nazi. Follow Jesus.

Screen Shot 2022-10-31 at 11.57.51 AM

10-26-22 PENN. CO. COMMISS. MEET. RECAP

Summary of Meeting: The “special meeting” was a virtual sounding board. No direct action was taken. A letter was written by Commissioner Lasseter. The commissioners seemed out-matched and out-classed…

RAPID CITY JOURNAL ARTICLE by Laura Heckmann who cited the biased Washington Post a couple times, and an article critical of Rick Weible. And we got upgraded to “Election skeptics”, instead of “- deniers”: You can let her know how you feel here: [email protected]

https://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/election-skeptics-question-pennington-county-processes/article_f4ac4b6b-18a5-5a6b-89b7-087092cb14a0.html

PENN. COUNTY YOUTUBE, OCT 26TH, MEETING:

Matthew’s PowerPoint for 10-26 Meeting:

10-26 PACKET LINK:

ALL MEETINGS AGENDA/PACKET: https://www.pennco.org/index.asp?SEC=8A0DB87E-B305-494C-8085-145A7BF536DC

COMMISSIONER LASSETTER’S LETTER. COMMISSIONERS DID NOTHING…JUST WROTE LETTER

SHERIFF, “REGULARLY SCHEDULED” MEETING, PUBLIC COMMENT, CLASS 2 MISDEMEANOR

LINK: https://sdlegislature.gov/Statutes/Codified_Laws/2031398

NOTE the words at the BOTTOM of the page, “All meetings…”:

“All meetings require a period for public comment pursuant to SDCL 1-25-1.”

Notice the “PUBLIC COMMENT FORM” language, “All comments and concerns are welcomed…Citizen involvement is very important to the success of our local government.”

Drewes to Monfore, 10-26

I tried to give you an opportunity to tell your story and then you attempt to rile up an audience with a illegitimate demand of more public comment. Not part of a special meeting, and since you contend to know all the requirements, you should have known that. It wasn’t worth arguing with you, because you are never wrong! You indicated you don’t trust elected officials but you expect us to trust you. Gary Drewes

Monfore to Drewes, 10-26

Mr. Drewes.

I got ur email. Thanks for reaching out to me.
…You may be aware that, that statute is debated as to its intent and language. There is a case at the SODAK Supreme Court on Nov. 8th…The term “regularly” and the enumerated exemptions – inauguration, swearing in, etc…

Excerpt from a text I sent to someone:
“The statute for class 2 misdemeanor if no public comment is allowed..

The debated word is “regularly”But “special meeting” is not delineated in the exemptions…
Just inauguration, swearing in, etc…
So, if this meeting is an “extension ” of the” regular”, the regular rules should apply…
In effect, we should have just had a regular meeting, got on the agenda, and there would have been forced “public comment” time….

But because this was “special” we aren’t afforded it…
Which is odd. Considering on Oct. 18th Sarah Frankensteen, the purple suited lawyer for the county who spoke, spoke for an hour on the agenda, and I rebutted for a half hour…

And if all the people who were here would have showed up, they would have been given public comment time by law…but not here…tricky business lol 😀”

Regardless, you are aware that there is a difference between an official agenda item and “public comment”. You had a room full of your constituents…The least you could have done ,even at your discretion, was to give time to hear what your people had to say…not just what the experts did.

In the end, the meeting was basically a “sounding board”. The County will not protect its citizens…

You had about 10 minutes left of time at the end, and one of the commissioners wanted to adjourn after about 15 mins. into your time…..

I am not trying to be irreasonable, just common-sensical…

Please don’t misconstrue criticism in this area, as a taint to anything else you have done… but when you, or others, can’t take a “head-shaking” from the crowd, your skin is rather thin…

God-fearing, courageous, independent-critical thinking, common sense, leaders are rare these days… 

Alarmists? Not with undue reasons, but our eyes are duly opened, and to not have secure elections, leads to many other ills, and can be deadly…

Anyways, as usual, sorry we had to meet in this way; always better on the golf course or another place where we could enjoy just being human…apart from all this..

Best,

Matthew

OCTOBER 18TH, ATTORNEY FRANKENSTEIN PRESENTATION; MONFORE REBUTTAL

RCJOURNAL: https://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/pennington-county-commission-receives-presentation-on-election-laws/article_d8a7533f-c25e-58f5-b9d1-957dd17580e5.html

PENN. CO. YOUTUBE: 9min 45sec Frankenstein; 1hr 13min Monfore

OCTOBER 4TH PENN. CO. MEETING: 6min. 45sec.

GOING AFTER “REGISTRATION” “RESIDENCY” AT AMERICA’S WAY (4 THOUSAND + VOTERS) AND VILLA DRIVE (500? VOTERS): SEE HIGHLIGHTED PART:

Dr. Frank joined us in-person, and we had a number of other Patriotic experts join us. FOR the 10-26 Meeting

To help raise money to pay our expenses, DONATE here: